E. L. Gregoraszczuk, T. Milewicz*, J. Kolodziejczyk,J. Krzysiek*, A. Basta**, K. Sztefko† S. Kurek†† and J, Stachurd‡
Laboratory of Reproductive Physiology and Toxicology of Domestic Animals, Department of Physiology, Institute of Zoology; *Department of Endocrinology and Fertility; **Department of Gynecologic Oncology; †Department of Oncology; ††Department of Clinical Biochemistry; and ‡Department of Pathology, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Professor E. L. Gregoraszczuk, Laboratory of Reproductive Physiology and Toxicology of Domestic Animals, Department of Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, 30-060 Krakow, Poland;
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of human breast cancer tissue to secrete growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and prolactin in response to 10-7 M progesterone stimulation. Explants were divided according to estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) phenotype (ER(-)PR(-); ER(+)PR(-); ER(+)PR(+); ER(-)PR(+)). Our results show distinct differences in cultured breast cancer tissue responses to progesterone stimulation with regard to secretion of proliferative agents such as GH, IGF-I and prolactin. All but ER(—)PR(—) breast cancer cell types responded in vitro to progesterone stimulation with an increase in local GH secretion, while in non-malignant tissue progesterone induced local GH secretion only in PR(+) cells. Moreover, only in PR(+) cells did progesterone stimulate local IGF-I and prolactin secretion, in both malignant and non-malignant tissue. This study provides evidence for the first time that in PR(+) breast cancer tissue, progesterone may increase GH, prolactin and IGF-I secretion in both malignant and surrounding non-malignant tissue. These hormones may act as local growth factors that stimulate the proliferation of mammary tumors.
Key words: HUMAN BREAST CANCER, PROGESTERONE, GROWTH HORMONE, PROLACTIN, IGF-I, IN VITRO.
Introduction
There is still no precise account of the role of progestins in human breast cancer development. Depending on the dose and the experimental model, progesterone has been reported to either stimulate or inhibit the growth of experimental mammary tumors[1-4]. The highest proliferation rate was observed in women receiving progestin-only formulations of contraceptives, suggesting a strong mitogenic action of progestins on mammary epithelium[3,5]. Soderqvist[5] showed that both endogenous progesterone and exogenous progestins augment proliferation of breast epithelial tissue. On the other hand, Botella et al.[6] showed that the progestins nomegestrol acetate, ORG2058, norethindrone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate and promegestone (R.5020) induce a dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation as measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Horwitz et al[7] showed that progesterone added to the medium of T47Dco human breast cancer cells is metabolized with a half life of 2-4 hours, and Wiebe et al[8] later suggested that a change in in situ progesterone metabolism, resulting in an increased 5α-pregnane-3,20-dione : 3α- hydroxy-4-pregnen-20-one ratio, may induce breast cancer by promoting increased cell proliferation, whereas increases in 4-pregnenes may retard these tumorigenenic processes; these studies may help explain the discrepancies found in different laboratories.
A retrospective cohort study, carried out by Schairer et al.[9], showed that long-lasting (over 5 years) combined estrogen-progestin hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with estrogen-only HRT. However, Ross et al.[10] found that continuous estrogen-progestin HRT carries a smaller risk ofbreast cancerthan sequential HRT.
The other interesting and unresolved question is the dependency of progesterone’s action on sex steroid-receptor phenotypes. Recently, there has been an enormous amount of information on the oxidative pathway particularly in tumors of estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) phenotype. Castagnetta et al.[11] showed a prevalence of reductive metabolism (estrone to estradiol) in ER(+) cells, while oxidative pathways (estradiol to estrone) were largely dominant in mammary cells that expressed ER poorly. The other possibility is the mitogenic action of progesterone via growth hormone (GH), prolactin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) secretion, hormones that have growth-promoting characteristics. In animal models, progestin administration results in local mammary production of GH in both normal and malignant breast tissue. The highest level of GH mRNA has been found after the prolonged exposure of dogs and cats to progestins[12]. Prolonged progestin administration has previously been shown to induce circulating GH excess[13-16]. Selman et al.[17] showed that progestin-induced GIT excess originates from foci of hyperplastic ductular epithelium of the mammary gland in dogs. Surprisingly, there are no data reporting the expression of the GH gene in the human mammary gland, and the question of whether GH expression or local mammary production of GH is induced by progesterone needs to be resolved.
Treatment of the T47D human breast carcinoma cell line with a synthetic progestin has been shown to induce a time- and dose-dependent increase in insulin receptor content as well as in IGF-II concentration[18]. Insulin alone has a small effect on cell growth. Exposure to progesterone markedly potentiates the effect of insulin. Papa et al. suggested the importance of progestin-insulin interaction for breast cancer growth regulation[19].
Tumors are routinely classified as ER(+)PR(+) when the tissue expresses both estrogen and pro-gesterone receptors; as ER(-)PR(-) if neither type of receptor is expressed; as ER(+)PR(—) when more than 50% of tissue expresses estrogen receptors; and finally as ER(—)PR(+) if expression of progesterone receptors is present in more than 50% of cells.
The possible mechanisms by which progestins may affect mammary gland proliferation need further investigation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of human breast cancer tissue to secrete GH, IGF-I and prolactin in response to progesterone stimulation, and whether the response is dependent on sex steroid-receptor phenotype.
Materials and methods
Both breast cancer tissue and non-malignant mammary tissue were obtained during radical mastectomies performed at the Gynecological Oncology Department of the Jagiellonian University in Kracow, Poland. Explants of malignant and surrounding non-malignant tissue were prepared under the close supervision ofa pathologist, to pre-vent interfering with further pathologic evaluation of malignant lesions of the breast. Some of the explants were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 hours at room temperature, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin using a standard procedure. Sections 5 μM thick were mounted on slides and deparafffnated before processing for receptor determination by immunohistochemistry. Type and prevalence of steroid tissue receptors were evaluated using commercial monoclonal antibody kits manufactured by DACO A/S (Denmark). Each section was assessed to demonstrate the presence of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR). Tumors were classified as ER(+)PR(+), ER(-)PR(—), ER(+)PR(-) or ER(-)PR(+).
Mammary gland in vitro incubation
The remaining explants from the malignant tissue and surrounding non-malignant tissue were trimmed into 0.5 cm3 pieces, weighed and incubated in 2 ml ofM199 medium containing 5% calf serum. Results obtained by means of iinmuno- histochemistry were later matched with those from culture. Four explants obtained from malignant or non-malignant tissue of each individual patient were placed in culture tubes and incubated for 48 h in control medium or with the addition of 10-7 M progesterone. This resulted in 16, 48, 16 and 12 malignant and non-malignant ER(-)PR(-); ER(+)PR(+); ER(-)PR(+); and ER(+)PR(-) tissue explants, respectively. Experimental tubes with explants were shaken gently at 37°C. The media were continuously gassed with 5% CO2/95% air during incubation. After 48 hours’ incubation, the collected media were frozen at -20°C for evaluation of human GH, IGF-I and prolactin levels in the media.
Hormone concentration evaluation
All culture media were stored at —20°C until assayed. IGF-I levels were measured using a Biosource Europe S.A. RIA kit (Belgium). Sensitivity was 0.25 ng/ml; coefficients of variation within and between assays were 4.1% and 9.3%, respectively; cross-reactivity with insulin was 0.001%, with human GH 0.01%, and with IGF-II 0.2%. Human GH levels were estimated with an OP (Swierk, Poland), RIA kit. Sensitivity was 0.5 ng/ml; and coefficients ofvariation within and between assays were 2.1% and 2.7%, respectively. For prolactin assessment, a Spectra (Orion Diagnostica, Finland) RIA kit was used. Sensitivity was 0.6 ng/ml, the coefficients ofvariation within and between assays were 2.3% and 3.4%, respectively; cross-reactivity with human GH was 0.039%; and there was no cross-reactivity with follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin or human placental lactogen (PL).
Statistical analysis
All data points are expressed as mean±SEM. Significant differences between the concentrations of GH, prolactin and IGF-I in malignant and non-malignant tissue and between control and progesterone-treated explants were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and using Duncan’s new multiple-range test. The normal distribution of data was checked by the Mann-Whitney U test.
Results
In highly differentiated malignant tissue ((ER(+)PR(+)) there was no difference between basal GEI secretion by malignant and non- malignant tissue (0,03 ± 0.001 ng/10 mg tissue vs. 0.02 ± 0.002 ng/10 mg tissue, respectively). However, progesterone produced a decrease in GH secretion in non-malignant tissue (0.05 + 0.001 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated tissue vs. 0.03 ng± 0.001 ng/10 mg control tissue; p<0.05) (Figure la).
Figure 1. Growth hormone (GH), (b) insulin-like growth factor I (I GF-I) and (c) prolactin release by expiants of non-malignant and malignant tissue from non-hormone dependent (ER—PR—), estradiol receptor-positive and progesterone receptor-positive (ER+PR+), progesterone receptor-positive early (ER—PR+) and estradiol receptor-positive only (ER+PR—) breast cancer. Expiants were cultured in M199 medium supplemented with 5% serum as a control medium or with the addition of 10-5 M progesterone . *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 for control vs. progesterone - stimulated expiants; and a-a, no significant difference; a-b, p < 0.05; a—c, p < 0,01 for non-malignant vs. malignant tissue
Basal IGF-I secretion in ER(+)PR(+) malignant tissue was twice as high as that of non- malignant tissue (5.7 + 0.5 ng/10 mg control malignant tissue vs. 2.9 ± 0.2 ng/10 mg control non-malignant tissue p<0.01). Progesterone increased IGF-I secretion in both malignant and non-malignant tissue (7.8 ± 0.6 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated malignant tissue vs. 5.7 ± 0.5 ng/10 mg control malignant tissue; 3.8 ± 0.3 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated non- malignant tissue vs. 2.9 ± 0.2 ng/10 mg control non-malignant tissue, p < 0.05) (Figure lb). Prolactin secretion from control and progesterone- stimulated tissue was higher in malignant ER(+)PR(+) tissue than in non-malignant tissue (3.8 ± 0.2 ng/10 mg control malignant tissue vs. 2.1 ± 0.02 ng/10 mg control non-malignant tissue (55%); and 4.5 ± 0.1 ng/10 mg progesterone- stimulated malignant tissue vs. 3.2 ± 0.08 ng/ 10 mg progesterone-stimulated non-malignant tissue (71%). In contrast to GH and IGF-I, exposure to progesterone caused the highest prolactin rise only in ER(-)PR(+) breast cancer tissue (p < 0.01) (Figure lc).
Malignant ER(+)PR(—) tissue GH secretion increased in response to progesterone stimulation (0.1 ± 0.02 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated tissue vs. 0.06 ± 0.001 ng/10 mg control tissue; p < 0.01) while in non-malignant tissue, progesterone exerted no influence on GH secretion (Figure la). Neither in malignant nor in non- malignant ER(+)PR(—) tissue did progesterone influence IGF-I release (Figure lb). The same pattern applied for prolactin secretion in malignant ER(+)PR(—) tissue (Figure lc).
Non-malignant ER(—)PR(+) tissue under both basal and progesterone-stimulated conditions secreted a higher amount of GIT than malignant tissue (Figure la). However, in both malignant and non-malignant ER(—)PR(+) tissue, progesterone significantly increased GH secretion (0.21 ± 0.01 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated non-malignant tissue vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 ng/mg control non-malignant tissue; and 0.13 ng ± 0.03 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated malignant tissue vs. 0.08 ng ± 0.001 ng/10 mg control malignant tissue, p < 0.01) (Figure la). In this type of the tumor, IGF-I release followed the same pattern as GH. Control and progesterone-stimulated IGF-I secretion in malignant tissue was lower than in non-malignant tissue. However, progesterone exposure significantly (p < 0.05) augmented IGF-I secretion in both malignant and non- malignant ER(-)PR(+) tissue (14.9 ± 0.5 ng/ 10 mg progesterone-stimulated non-malignant tissue vs. 12.4 ± 0.4 ng/mg control non-malignant tissue; and 7.3 ± 0.5 ng/10 mg progesterone- stimulated malignant tissue vs. 6.4 ng ± 0.4 ng/ 10 mg control malignant tissue) (Figure lb). Control prolactin secretion was lower in malignant ER(—)PR(+) tissue (7.4 ± 0.04 ng/ 10 mg malignant tissue vs. 9.8 ± 0.08 ng/10 mg non- malignant tissue, p < 0.05), while a progesterone- stimulated prolactin secretion increase was found only in malignant tissue (12,8 ± 0.5 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated malignant tissue vs. 7.4 ± 0.01 ng/10 mg control malignant tissue, p < 0.01) (Figure lc).
While progesterone did not change GH secretion in ER(-)PR(—) non-malignant tissue, an increase in GH release was observed in malignant tissue (0.05 ± 0.001 ng/10 mg tissue in progesterone-stimulated malignant tissue vs. 0.03 ± 0.001 ng/ 10 mg in control malignant tissue, p<0.05) (Figure la). Progesterone significantly decreased IGF-I secretion by non-malignant ER(-)PR(-) tissue (1.9 ± 0.3 ng in progesterone- stimulated non-malignant tissue vs. 3.7 + 0.4 ng/ 10 mg in control non-malignant tissue, p<0.01), with no such effect in malignant ER(-)PR(—) explants (Figure lb). Similarly, progesterone caused a decrease in prolactin secretion by non- malignant ER(—)PR(—) tissue (1.9 ± 0.2 ng/10 mg progesterone-stimulated tissue vs. 6.8 ± 0.3 ng/ 10 mg control tissue), but had no effect on malig-nant ER(—)PR(—) tissue (Figure lc).
Discussion
Progesterone and progestins have been shown to stimulate GH gene expression in both malignant and normal mammary glands of a bitch[20]. These agents also increase the local secretion of IGF-I, IGF-II and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in dogs, cats and humans[21]. The maximal level of GH inRNA was found after prolonged progestin administration, which occurs in women taking monophasic oral contraception or continuous combined HRT[22]. Malignant breast tissue preserves GH and IGF-I local secretion, although this is less progesterone dependent[13]. Epithelial proliferation can be stimulated directly through GH binding to epithelial receptors or indirecdy through stromal augmentation of IGF-I secretion[23]. Prolactin as well as GH may be locally produced by bo th normal and neoplastic mammary glands. In humans, GH activates both prolactin and GH receptors, which leads to elevations in IGF-I as well as functionally active prolactin levels. IGF-I hyperactivity seems to be insufficient alone for activation ofbreast tumor formation, but together with prolactin, is able to induce pathological proliferation[24]. Moreover, prolactin suppresses IGFBP-5, which is a potent inhibitor of IGF-I action[25]. We have documented the response of breast cancer tissue to progesterone stimulation, demonstrating a significant increase in GH release regardless of receptor phenotype, winch in unstimulated tissue occurred only in progesterone receptor-positive tissue. Progesterone induced a significant increase in IGF-I release in progesterone receptor-expressing malignant tissue, whereas basal IGF-I secretion was higher in malignant estrogen receptor-expressing tissue. Prolactin secretion augmentation in response to progesterone exposure was found only in PR(+)ER(—) phenotype breast cancer tissue.
Growth hormone and IGF-I synergize with estrogen to induce normal mammary gland development. Estrogen receptor expression in mammary gland epithelium is increased in animals after GH administration[26]. A positive correlation has been found between IGF type I receptor (IGFR-I) and sex steroids receptors in mammary gland tumors[27]. IGFR-I blockade inhibits the growth of breast cancer cell lines[28]. Progesterone receptor signalling may have important conse-quences in terms of mammary development, particularly with regard to ductal versus alveolar growth[29]. According to Nizze et al.[30], ER(+)PR(+) and ER(-)PR(+) phenotypes might be regarded as low risk, whereas ER(+)PR(—) and ER(-)PR(-) phenotypes may be high risk[30]. This may pardy agree with our findings of increased basal IGF-I secretion in estrogen receptorexpressing malignant tissue and a higher basal GH release in ER(—)PR(-) breast cancer tissue. However one of the receptor phenotypes regarded by Nizze et al.[30] as low risk, i.e. ER(-)PR(+), vigorously responded to progesterone stimulation in our study, with a rise in GH, IGF-I and prolactin secretion in malignant tissue and GH and IGF-I secretion in non-malignant tissue. These increases may create a permissive environment for epithelial proliferation.
The importance oflocally produced prolactin in pathological conditions such as mammary tumor growth in women has been indicated in several studies[31,32]. Prolactin receptors have been found in 40-70% of human breast tumors[33,34]. There is no clear correlation between prolactinomas and mammary tumors in women. Ormandy et al.[35] showed that sex steroids and prolactin interact synergistically to control the neoplastic growth of the mammary gland. Prolactin receptor expression was linearly correlated with estrogen and progesterone receptor expression. Ormandy et al.[35] also suggested co-expression and cross-regulation of prolactin and sex steroid receptors providing a potential mechanism for the observed synergy between estrogen, progesterone and prolactin in the control of tumor growth. Progesterone pre-treatment enhances the ability of prolactin to stimulate transcription in mammary gland malignant tissue[35]. In our study, we found the highest basal and progesterone-stimulated prolactin secretion in both malignant and control tissue only if these tissues possessed progesterone receptors only,i. e. ER(—)PR(+) tissue, It is also worth pointing out that there was a lack of progesterone-induced inhibition of prolactin and IGF-I release in sex steroid receptor-negative malignant tissue in our study.
Our results indicate that there are distinct differ-ences in cultured breast cancer tissue responses to progesterone (10-7 M) stimulation with regard to secretion of proliferation-inducing agents such as GIT, IGF-I and prolactin. All but ER(-)PR(-) phenotype breast cancer explants of malignant tissue responded in vitro to progesterone stimulation with an increase in local GH secretion, while in non-malignant tissue progesterone increased local GH secretion only in PR(+) phenotype breast cancer. The increase in local IGF-I and prolactin secretion by both malignant and non- malignant tissue under the influence of progesterone in vitro was noted only in PR(+) phenotype breast cancer. These data for the first time point to a stimulatory action of progesterone not on proliferation ofbreast epithelial cells but on GH, prolactin and IGF-I secretion. Prolactin and GIT are both mitogenic hormones. We propose that increased levels of prolactin, IGF-I and GH under the influence of progesterone in PR(+) phenotype breast cancer may act as local growth factors that stimulate the proliferation of mammary tumors.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported partly by grant DS/IZ/2000 and partly by KBN grant from the Committee for Scientific Research 501/KL/425/L.
References
Pike MC, Spicer DV, Dahmous L, et al. Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 1993;15:17-35
King RJB. Biology of female sex hormone action in relation to contraceptive agents and neoplasia. Contraception 1991;43:527-42
Horwitz KB. The molecular biology ofRU486. Is there a role for antiprogestins in treatment of breast cancer? Endocr Rev 1991;13:146-62
van Leeuwen FE. Epidemiologic aspects of exogenous progestogens in relation to their role in pathogenesis of human breast cancer. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1991;125:13-26
Soderqvist G. Effects of sex steroids on proliferation in normal mammary tissue. Ann Med 1998;30: 511-24
Botella J, Duranti E, Duc I, et al. Inhibition by nomegestrol acetate and other synthetic progesterone proliferation and progesterone receptor content of T47-D human breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1994;50:41-7
Horwitz KB, Pike AW, Gonzalez-Aller C, et al. Progesterone metabolism in T47Dco human breast cancer cells - II Intracellular metabolic path of progesterone and synthetic progestins. J Steroid Biochem 1986;25:911-6
WiebeJP, Muzia D, PIuJ, et al. The 4-pregnenand 5 alpha-pregnane progesterone metabolites formed in nontumorous and tumorous breast tissue have opposite effects on breast cell proliferation and adhesion. Cancer Res 2000;60:936-43
Schairer C, Lubin J, Troisi R, et al. Menopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:485-91
Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, Wan PC,c/ at. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:324-32
Castagnetta LA, Granada OM, Taibi G, et al. 17-beta hydroxysteroid oxidoreductase activity in intact cell significantly differs from classical enzymatology analysis. J Endocrinol 1996;150: S73-8
Mol JA, van-Garderen E, Selman PJ, et al. Growth hormone mRNA in mammary gland tumours of dogs and cats. J Clin Invest 1995;95:2028-34
Concannon PW, Altzsuler N, Hampshire Butler WB, et al. Growth hormone, prolactin and cortisol in dogs developing mammary nodules and an acromegalic-like appearance during treatmentwith medroxy-progesterone acetate. Endocrinology 1980; 106:1173-7
Rijnberk A, Eigenmann JE, Belshaw BE, et al. Acromegaly associated with transient overproduction of growth hormone in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1980;177:534-7
EigenmannJE, Rijnberk A. Influence of medroxy-progesterone acetate (Provera) on plasma growth hormone levels and on carbohydrate metabolism. I. Studies in the ovary hysterectomized bitch. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1981;98:599-602
Clarke CL, Sutherland RL. Progestin regulation of cellularproliferation. Endocr Rev 1990;11:266-301
Selman PJ, Mol JA, Rutteman GR, et al. Progestin-induced growth hormone excess in the dog originates in the mammary gland. Endocrinology 1994;134:287-92
Goldfine ID, Papa V, Vigneri R, et al. Progestin regulation of insulin and insulin-like growth factor I receptors in cultured human breast cancer tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 1992;22:69-79
Papa V, Reese CC, Brunetti A, et al. Progestins increase insulin receptor content and insulin stimulation of growth in human breast carcinoma tissue. Cancer Res 1990;50:7858-62
Mol JA, Selman PJ, Sprang EP, et al. The role of progestins, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF-binding proteins in the normal and neoplastic mammary gland of the bitch: a review. J Reprod Fertil (Suppl) 1997;51:339-44
Mol JA, van Garderen E, Rutteman GR, et al. New insights in the molecular mechanism of progestin-induced proliferation of mammary epithelium: induction of the local biosynthesis of growth hormone (GH) in the mammary glands of dogs, cats and humans. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1996;57:67-71
Lee NC, Rosero-Bixby L, Oberle MW, et al. A case-control study of breast cancer and hormonal contraception in Costa Rica. J Nad Cancer Inst 1987;9:1247-54
Ilkbahar YN, Thordarson G, Camarillo IG, et al. Differential expression of the growth hormone receptor and growth hormone-binding protein in epithelia and stroma of the mouse mammary gland at various physiological stages. J Endocrinol 1999; 1161:77-87
Wennbo H, Tomell J. The role of prolactin and growth hormone in breast cancer. Oncogene 2000; 19:1072-6
Flint DJ, Knight CH. Interactions of prolactin and growth hormone (GH) in the regulation of mammary gland function and epithelial cell survival. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1997;2:41-8
Feldman M, Ruan W, Tappin I, et al. The effect of GH on estrogen receptor expression in the rat mammary gland. J Endocrinol 1999;163:515-22
Happerfield LC, Miles DW, Bames DM, etal. The localization of the insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGFR-1) in benign and malignant breast tissue. J Pathol 1997;183:412-17
Webster NJ, ResnikJL, Reichart DB, et al. Repression of the insulin receptor promoter by the tumor suppressor gene product p53: a possible mechanism for receptor overexpression in breast cancer. Cancer Res 1996;56:2781-8
Shyamala G, Yang X, Cardiff RD, etal. Impact of progesterone receptor on cell-fate decisions during mammary gland development. Proc Natl Acad Set USA 2000;97:3044-9
Nizze H, Al-Thobhani AK, Terpe H. Steroid hormone receptor status and other immunohistochemical prognostic markers in benign and malignant diseases of the breast. Zentralbl Chir (Suppl) 1998;5:14-8
RicherJK, Lange CA, Manning NG, etal. Convergence of progesterone with growth factor and cytokine signaling in breast cancer. Progesterone receptors regulate signal transducers and activators of transcription expression and activity. J Biol Chem 1998;47:31317-26
Ben-Jonathan N, Mershon JL, Allen DL, et al. Extrapituitary prolactin, distribution, regulation, functions, and clinical aspects. EndocrRev 1996;17: 639-60
Ginsburg E, Vonderhaar BK. Prolactin synthesis and secretion by human breast cancer tissue. Cancer Res 1995;55:2591-5
BonneterreJ, PeyartJP.BeuscartR, etal. Prognostic significance of prolactin receptors in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1987;47:4724-8
Ormandy CJ, Hall RE, Manning DL, et al. Coexpression and cross-regulation of the prolactin receptor and sex steroid hormone receptor in breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:3692-9